Spacer
spacer Home Home Printer Friendly icon Printer-friendly Contact Us icon Contact us Log in icon Log in
About the GTC
Registration
Standards and regulation
GTC Networks
Teacher Learning Academy
Continuing professional development
Policy
arrow Research
arrow How is research funded at the GTC?
arrow GTC research criteria
arrow Programme of GTC commissioned research
arrow Research of the Month (RoM)
arrow About RoM
arrow Continuing professional development
arrow Curriculum
arrow Inclusion
arrow Management of learning
arrow Teaching and learning
arrow Research informed professional practice
arrow GTC annual survey of teachers
arrow CPD leader resources
arrow Research of the Month 'tasters'
Parents
Events
News and features
GTC Publications
Teaching: the GTC magazine
Video section
Useful websites

Teaching methods in England and France - an overview

Why compare the school systems of different countries? What lessons can be learned?

Why is this issue important?

Much work goes into developing and refining the education system, but teachers can find it hard to change their current practice and take on board new ideas. Comparing the English education system with other countries is a valuable way of helping teachers explore teaching and learning strategies, their effectiveness and the beliefs that underpin teachers’ practices.

What did the research show?

When the researchers compared English and French pupil’s performance, they found they had different strengths and weaknesses in literacy and mathematics. In literacy, English pupils were better at reading comprehension, use of homonyms (words which have the same spelling but different meanings, such as bear and bare), technical aspects of writing (handwriting, spelling and punctuation), and purpose and organisation in story writing. French children made greater use of sophisticated syntactic structures and literary expressions. In maths, English children were better at shape, space and measurement and applying their maths knowledge in problem solving. French children’s strengths in maths were with computation (addition, division, multiplication, and understanding place value and decimal points).

English and French pupils’ attitudes towards school and work also differed. Whilst English pupils regarded work as a collaborative effort and recognised the important social role it played in their current lives, French pupils saw school work as an individual pursuit involving cognitive skills, and regarded schooling as preparation for their future careers. Interestingly, (given the findings about their teachers’ didactic teaching style reported in the next section) French pupils found school work relatively more interesting and more fun than English children.

How was it achieved?

Key differences were identified between English and French teaching styles. Whilst French teaching was teacher-led consisting mostly of whole class activities with some individual pupil work, English teachers promoted small group and pair work. The teachers’ beliefs about what constituted equality of opportunity (underpinning their teaching styles) also differed. French teachers held the belief that “every child has the right to have access to the same educational experience”, while English teachers differentiated their practice to the needs of the individual child. It was apparent that despite attempts to introduce reform at the time of the study, teachers in both countries showed a resistance to change.

How was the research designed to be trustworthy?

The study involved a sample of 400 French and 400 English pupils aged nine to eleven years. All the children involved in the study completed a questionnaire investigating their perceptions and understandings about teaching, school, national identity and citizenship. Pupils also sat literacy and mathematics tests and researchers conducted classroom observations and interviews.

What are the implications?

The study shows:

What do the case studies illustrate?

The case studies show:

Read the RoM

 

Freedom of Information | Privacy policy